top of page

Artificial Intelligence
& Software Intellectual Property

experienced U.S. patent counsel for AI innovators

AddyHart assists software companies, artificial intelligence developers, cloud computing providers, startups, universities, and technology innovators in obtaining and managing patent protection in the United States. We combine deep technical expertise with practical patent prosecution experience to help clients protect software-driven innovations while navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of patent eligibility, USPTO examination, and post-grant practice.

Patent Prosecution for AI and Software

Artificial intelligence and software inventions present unique challenges during patent prosecution, particularly under 35 U.S.C. § 101. We work closely with clients to develop applications that clearly describe technical innovations, emphasize technological improvements, and position inventions for successful examination before the USPTO. 

 

Read more about how AI is reshaping the patent landscape. 

Open Source & Software Strategy

Modern software products frequently incorporate open source software, cloud infrastructure, and third-party components. We help clients identify and manage intellectual property risks while protecting the innovations that differentiate their products.

​

Read more about managing patent risk in open source software projects.

Related Publications & Insights

Open Source, Closed Door: Managing Patent Risk in Open Source (OSS)-Driven Products

The Legal Intelligencer

ChatGPT Meets the POSITA: How AI Is Reshaping the Foundations of Patent Law

The Legal Intelligencer

How Patent Eligibility Declarations Can Stave Off Rejection

Law360

Including a Description of Technical Advantages During Patent Application Drafting May Help Patent Eligibility

Intellectual Property Law Section Proceedings

Related Divergent IP Blog Articles

Reframing Patent Eligibility: U.S. § 101 Case Law Through the Lens of Japanese Technicality Doctrine

Brandon Theiss

image.png
Lean Patent Operations: Jidoka, Automation, and AI in Patent-Prosecution Workflows

Brandon Theiss

AdobeStock_1905618537_edited.jpg
SMEDs After the USPTO’s 2026 Guidance: Rule 132 Declarations, Corroboration, and the Need for a Court-Ready § 101 Record

Brandon Theiss

AdobeStock_2013727509_edited.jpg
bottom of page