<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" generatedBy="WIX">
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/3개월-기한은-최후의-안전장치이지-제출-목표일이-아니다</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-21</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_76cf98d3389d46e0a0e695af6f96d15a~mv2.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/restriction-requirement의-실질적-한정-효과-focus-products-v-kartri-사건이-주는-교훈</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-12</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_c4b766e659fc4af8a0f5c8b5982d35d3~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/글로벌-심사관-면담-uspto-epo-jpo-한국-및-중국-특허청에서의-커뮤니케이션-구속력-출원경과-리스크</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-06</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/11062b_b2752c8c6f55484e8b230ba3cac64394~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/하나의-디자인-두-가지-제도-lkq-이후-미국-및-eu-디자인-보호</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_235c43de7c514f5da1f7b0d202c7a2ea~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/잘못된-매핑이지-미니-심리가-아니다-uspto의-새로운-재심사-명령-전-서면-절차에-관한-사례-연구</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-16</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_338cf61710db4ca0a86305283a22a47d~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/uspto의-2026년-지침-이후의-smed-규칙-132-선언서-보강-증거-그리고-법원-심사에-견딜-수-있는-101-기록의-필요성</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-02</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_ba9f502efd994365a92247dc81a754c3~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/패밀리를-계속-열어-두기-미국-계속출원-실무와-유럽-중국-한국-및-일본의-비교</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-12</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_c63fb7504be04a578fc06cf559b1100b~mv2.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/uspto와-epo의-비공개-선행기술-선출원-후공개-특허출원의-비교법적-고찰</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-10</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_153d5fd3c82a40a5a93aa0d5237b01a8~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/미국-및-중국-특허법에서의-청구범위와-공개-명세서-기재-뒷받침-충분한-공개-및-검토-절차별-특수성</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-14</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_8ef5a81d88284d29a868b806898c84f6~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/린-특허-운영-특허-출원-심사-워크플로에서의-지도카-자동화-및-ai</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-23</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_dfede13305814af39b7cdb6e732b191b~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/통상의-기술자를-위해-작성되고-모두가-읽는-문서복수의-독자층을-고려한-특허출원서-작성</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-20</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_fe3bd939f02f437d87f317db38d81814~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/타-분야-선행기술과-사후적-고찰-미국의-유사-선행기술-법리와-epo의-과제-해결-접근법</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-27</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_0bb0fc2f35c24fb289d64454681df8ba~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/한국과-미국의-특허권-존속기간-구제-특허청-지연과-규제-지연의-구별</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-29</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_60ba1028e7e3466c985a93467017b6a4~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/같은-office-action-다른-이해관계-ex-parte-재심사와-통상적인-특허출원-심사에서의uspto-office-action-대응</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-04</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_439071df6a5d400a9ac01fd10bc95c6a~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/미국-pct-실무에서-371-국내단계와바이패스-계속출원-중-선택하기</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-16</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_bcb7d9544fdd438ba3db773f4a2025fc~mv2.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/심사관은-상대방-대리인이-아니다조정적-변론으로서의-특허-출원심사</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-14</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_da53484f28934049973102e9aa7881f2~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/배제권을-넘어-대기업은-왜-행사하지-않을-수도-있는-특허를-취득하는가</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-24</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_84a1cc482e5a4ab28934f53b825fd7db~mv2.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/굴복-없는-진실성-정보공개진술서-ids-제출의-철학적-근거</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-19</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_752411e350e640c6bcda2946254d6dac~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/특허-심사-항소의-번역-uspto-ptab-항소와-jpo-거절결정불복심판의-비교</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-18</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_d2e9d511763a404c9957eaf07a4fa869~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/fda-uspto-간-일관성-관리-inequitable-conduct-및-규제-리스크를-방지하기-위한-cross-agency-candor</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-12</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_3c207f5d29b1408595694112cd96882d~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/속지적-함정-미국-및-중국-유래-발명에-대한-외국-출원-제한</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-08</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_1bb2055bfc7f4d108e2ded8bbb20c52d~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.divergentpatentlaw.com/ko/post/특허적격성의-재구성-일본의-기술성-technicality-원칙을-통해-본-미국-특허법-제101조-판례</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-12</lastmod>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dac807_3e9395fa69e641d2a76e33569b34e1d6~mv2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>